Home   Consumers   Credit Unions   PCS, LLC   Newsroom   Contact Us  
     
  Consumers  
  About Credit Unions
 
  Find A Credit Union
 
  ATM Locations
 
  Financial Tools
 
  CU Employment
 
     
  Credit Unions  
  The League
 
  Affiliates
 
  Conferences
    and Training

 
  Services
 
  Political Action
 
  Chapters
 
  Compliance Resources
 
  Fraud Net
 
  '10 Resource Guide
 
     
  PCS, LLC
 
     
  Newsroom
 
  Latest News
 
  League Publications
 
  Trade Press
 
     
  Contact Us
 
  Contacts
 
  By Name
 
     
  Sitemap
 

 


LATEST NEWS

  • April 27, 2010

    SC credit unions elect smaller League board

    COLUMBIA, SC (4/27/10)—South Carolina credit unions elected seven directors to a new, downsized South Carolina Credit Union League (SCCUL) Board of Directors, replacing the fourteen-member group that existed for decades. Election results were announced at the Saturday, April 24 business session of the SCCUL & Affiliates 2010 Annual Meeting in Myrtle Beach, SC.

    New to the 2010-2011 SCCUL board of directors are Rick Hammond, president and CEO of S.C. State Credit Union (Columbia); and Robert Harris, CEO of Health Facilities Federal Credit Union (Florence). Re-elected from the 2009 body are: Faye Crocker, CEO of Greater Abbeville Federal Credit Union (Abbeville); Jerry Miller, president and CEO of Carolina Trust Federal Credit Union (Myrtle Beach); Ray Partain, chairman of the board for Anderson Federal Credit Union (Anderson); Ed Templeton, president and CEO of SRP Federal Credit Union (North Augusta); and Linda Weatherford, vice president at SPC Cooperative CU (Hartsville).

    Following the business session, the new board named its officers: Weatherford, chairman; Templeton, first vice chairman; Crocker, secretary; and Miller, treasurer. As former chairman, Scott Woods—president and CEO of SC Federal Credit Union (N. Charleston)—remains as an ex officio member of the board, as is SCCUL President and CEO Steve Fowler.

    League-member credit unions had voted on October 28, 2009 to reduce the SCCUL board size in light of changes in organizational complexity, including spin-off of some services to a limited-liability corporation and the slowly diminishing number of in-state credit unions.

    Of the seventy-seven member credit unions eligible to vote for the new directors, fifty-four sent ballots to independent accounting firm Cantey, Tiller, Pierce, & Green, LLP of Camden, S.C.

  • March 24, 2010

    Bankers' MBL attacks fail scrutiny

WASHINGTON (3/24/10)--Credit unions have been attacked by bankers with eight general claims against raising credit unions' member business lending (MBL) cap, but those claims do not stack up under scrutiny, according to an analysis by the Credit Union National Association (CUNA).

The claims and the facts that poke holes in the bankers' arguments are the topic of a feature this week in CUNA's online legislative/regulative news analysis publication, Credit Union NewsWatch, which is published twice a month.

One of the arguments centers on safety and soundness. Bankers say that raising the MBL cap to 25% of a credit union's assets (up from 12.25%) would undermine credit union safety and soundness.

But data collected by the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. show that credit unions have a long history of engaging in safe and sound business lending, and that business lending is actually much safer at credit unions than at other institutions, says CUNA's Research and Policy Analysis.

The data indicate:

    Credit union MBL net charge-off rates have been significantly lower than bank rates year-in and year-out for over a decade. Since 1997, credit union MBL net charge-off rates have averaged 0.15%, a figure that is roughly one-sixth of the 0.82% bank average during the same period.

    More recently, with the increased losses at all lenders from the financial crisis and recession, the increase in loss rates at credit unions pales in comparison to bank results. During 2009, credit unions charged off business loans at a 0.59% rate--about one-fourth the 2.36% rate reported by banks over the same period. In 2008, credit unions charged off 0.33% compared with banks' 1.01%. and in 2007, the figures were 0.09% for credit unions and 0.52% for banks.

    Compared to other loans at credit unions, business loan net charge-off rates are lower than net charge-off rates on credit union consumer loans and essentially identical to the net charge-off rates in credit union real estate loan portfolios.

    Most credit unions have excess liquidity today that is depressing their overall earnings. Moving assets from low-yielding investments into higher-yielding MBLs, even after accounting for credit losses on those loans, will increase earnings, capital contributions and overall safety and soundness.

    If the MBL cap were increased or eliminated, NCUA has indicated it would revise its regulation to ensure additional capacity in the credit union system would not result in unintended safety and soundness concerns.

  • January 6, 2010

    CUNA: Bankruptcies up, CUs in 'maintenance phase'

    MADISON, Wis. (1/6/10)--Personal bankruptcy filings hit 1.41 million last year--an increase of 32% over 2008. And credit unions can expect more chargeoffs during the post-recession, say Credit Union National Association (CUNA) economists.

    CUNA economist Steve Rick pointed out that the numbers will continue to go up because bankruptcies and chargeoffs lag behind a recession. "During a recession, people are existing for a while on their savings, and when that's used up they begin charging more, getting into debt." They make it through most of the recession. Then, it catches up and chargeoffs occur, he noted.

According to the National Bankruptcy Research Center, which compiles and analyzes bankruptcy data, 2009's bankruptcy filings are at their highest level since 2005 (The Wall Street Journal Jan. 5).

More people filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, which liquidates assets to pay off some debts and absolves the filers of other debts. Chapter 7 filings were up more than 42% as of November 2009, compared with November 2008. Chapter 13 filings increased by 12% and accounted for less than one-third of the 2009 filings as of November, the latest month statistics were available.

"You could see the increase coming with the last quarter's data," Mike Schenk, CUNA senior economist and vice president of economics and statistics, told News Now. "There naturally would be more bankruptcies after the recession than before."

He noted that consumers rushed to file bankruptcies in 2005 before new bankruptcy laws took effect that October. The laws make it more difficult to file for a Chapter 7 bankruptcy. Filers are required to under go a means test to determine if the filer can pay back at least a portion of the debt after it is restructured.

Rick agreed that credit unions could anticipate the losses and be prepared for them. "Credit unions for years have been in the building phase, building their allowances for loan losses (ALL) provisions in anticipation for an increase in chargeoffs. Now they're in the maintenance phase, where they will see a drop in provisions for ALL."

For credit unions, chargeoffs are still a small number, said Schenk. Both delinquencies and net chargeoffs remain substantially lower than bank norms, according to the U.S. Credit Union Profile's Third Quarter 2009 results.

In 2005, before the new law, credit unions experienced four bankruptcies per 1,000 members. That number tapered off to 1.4 bankruptcies per 1,000 members in 2006, followed by 1.8 in 2007, then 2.6 in 2008 and 3.7 as of September 2009.

The average number of bankruptcies per credit union has increased slightly from 39.3 in 2005 to 43 as of in September 2009, according to the profile report. Half of credit unions' chargeoffs are due to bankruptcies.

  • November 10, 2009

    President signs 21-day fix to Credit CARD Act

    WASHINGTON (11/10/09)—Starting the weekend off right for credit unions, President Barack Obama on Friday signed the CARD Act Technical Corrections Act (H.R. 3606) into law. He also penned his name to the bill extending the homebuyer tax credit.

The new CARD Act law fixes a situation that has been plaguing credit unions since the original Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility and Disclosure (CARD) Act was signed in May. That bill incorrectly implied that a 21-day late notice requirement applied to all open-end credit, and the Credit Union National Association (CUNA) has argued that it had always been lawmakers' intent to apply the provision only to credit cards.

The corrections bill states clearly that the late-notice provision applies only to credit cards.

CUNA has worked closely with lawmakers and their staffs warning that the drafting mistake would prevent credit unions from granting biweekly payment plans to their members, from sending members consolidated billing statements, and would force them to change payment due dates for members that had previously chosen due dates based on their specific financial circumstance.

The situation was particularly problematic for Home Equity Lines of Credit (HELOC) because the due date of a HELOC is often a contractual term.

CUNA President/CEO Dan Mica hailed the quick and decisive work by the House and Senate on the correction bill and the president's very timely signing of the measure.

"By signing the law, the president gives credit unions the opportunity to go back to doing what they do best: Serving their members with affordable and needed financial services.

"Credit unions can continue the practices of sending members consolidated billing statements, changing payment due dates for members who had previously chosen a due date based on their specific financial situation, and continuing bi-weekly payment plans--all essential tools consumers use to manage their finances in the ways that best suit their needs," Mica noted.

Mica also noted the efforts of "the leagues and the many credit unions" who worked with lawmakers to get the fix into law. "Without their efforts," Mica said, "credit unions would still be reeling from the unintended consequences of this law."

The President also signed legislation extending the $8,000 first-time homebuyer tax credit that was set to expire at the end of the month. That bill also creates a new $6,500 tax credit for current homeowners who purchase a new home between Dec. 1, 2009 and April 30, 2010.

  • August 7 , 2009

Matz gets Senate nod, will rejoin NCUA

WASHINGTON (8/7/09)--Deborah Matz on Friday was confirmed to join the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) by the full Senate and is soon expected to be named chair of the NCUA by President Barack Obama.

Credit Union National Association (CUNA) President/CEO Dan Mica congratulated Matz on her confirmation, saying that CUNA looks forward to working with Matz to ensure the "continued safety and soundness of credit unions" and to foster "a regulatory environment in which credit unions may continue to grow, prosper and effectively serve their members."

Matz was unanimously confirmed by both the full Senate and the Senate Banking Committee, and should soon join the NCUA board for the second time. Matz's nomination was scheduled for Senate approval several times in recent days, but a busy Senate calendar, dominated by such things as okaying $2 billion to extend the "cash for clunkers" program, and approving Sonia Sotomayor as a Supreme Court Justice, pushed back the Matz vote.

Matz last served on the board between 2002 and 2005, and most recently held the position of executive vice president and chief operating officer of Maryland-based, $800 million-in-assets Andrews FCU, an experience which Matz said "sensitized" her "to the need for effective, rather than excessive, regulation."

Matz in 2002 voted against what she has called "overly broad and permissive" NCUA corporate credit union regulations, and she said during recent Senate committee testimony that further work is needed to stabilize the corporate credit union system.

Matz has also promised to revamp some aspects of the NCUA's rules governing corporate credit unions once she takes on her new position at the NCUA, adding that such a rule would combine needed regulatory "flexibility" with the safeguards needed to prevent the current corporate credit union hardships from happening again.

 

  • July 31, 2009

CRMD provides Credit CARD Act 2009 guidance

An important provision of the Credit CARD Act of 2009 requires compliance by August 20, 2009 with the 21day rule, requiring creditors with open-end loans to provide consumers notification 21days in advance of their payment due date. Even though it is titled the "Credit CARD Act" this specific provision applies to all open-end loans not just credit cards. Implementing the statement provision has been difficult because of the very short time period the Fed has provided for compliance (by August 20th). The Carolinas Compliance and Risk Management Department (CRMD) has put together a list of the most common questions regarding this provision. Credit unions are reminded that each credit union situation is unique, and this information is guidance and should not be construed as legal advice. You are strongly encouraged to consult your own legal counsel when determining the most appropriate course of action for your credit union to achieve compliance.

1. Our members pay weekly- do we have to change payment due dates?

Essentially yes. Members must get their statement 21 days before the payment is due or you can not charge a late charge or consider the member delinquent in any way. That includes reporting to the credit bureau or pursuing collection activity.

2. Our credit union sends out loan statements quarterly- do we have to change to monthly statements?

Again, it looks like yes. Members must get their statement 21 days before the payment is due or you can not charge a late charge or consider the member delinquent in any way. That includes reporting to the credit bureau or collection activity.

3. What do we do if our data processor can not get everything in place by August 20?

The Fed has provided what they term a "short" time period to move in to compliance. That time period is undefined by the Fed, but the CRMD estimates possibly 30 days. During that short period while working out logistical requirements for changing due dates and providing statements, you can place a message on your statements that notifies members that "the payment will not be treated as late if received within 21days after the statement was mailed." Additionally, as mentioned above your credit union cannot treat the payment as late until after 21 days from statement mailing.

4. Our credit union allows members to make payments weekly or bi-weekly. How do we comply?

The key is to determine whether your credit union permits weekly/bi-weekly payments or requires them. If you have disclosed to your member via your credit agreement that payments must be made weekly, you will likely need to change members to a monthly due date while continuing to allow them to make weekly or bi-weekly payments. Members can make payments as many times during the month as your credit union will permit, however, you will need to ensure that when changing a member to monthly payment due dates, missing weekly payments will not be technically considered late.

For more information on the Credit CARD Act please contact the Carolinas Compliance and Risk Management Department at compliance@sccul.org.

  • July 8, 2009

Corp. CU update: NCUA begins stabilization process

ALEXANDRIA, Va. (6/8/09)--The National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) in its most recent update on the status of the corporate credit union system said that it has begun to use the Temporary Corporate Credit Union Stabilization Fund (TCCUSF) to cover corporate stabilization-related expenses.

In a Tuesday press release, the NCUA said that the implementation of the TCCUSF will allow natural person credit unions to "reflect a fully restored National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund (NCUSIF) deposit on their June 30 call reports."

According to the release, the TCCUSF has relieved the NCUSIF "from any reserve requirements" related to U.S. Central FCU's capital note by paying $1 billion into the NCUSIF.

The TCCUSF will also now oversee the Temporary Corporate Credit Union Share Guarantee Program (TCUSGP) and the Temporary Corporate Credit Union Liquidity Guarantee Program (TCCULGP), the NCUA added. The majority of corporate credit unions have agreed to take part in the TCCULGP, the NCUA said.

The NCUA also updated the status of U.S. Central and Western Corporate Federal Credit Union (WesCorp), reporting that "normal operations" at those two credit unions "continue without interruption."

WesCorp announced that it expects to recognize a 30% reduction in operating costs this year due to a number of cost cutting measures, including "consolidations and staff reductions," the release said.

  • July 3, 2009

NCUA working with agencies on Credit CARD Act, UDAP

ALEXANDRIA, Va. (7/2/09)—The National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) said Wednesday it has begun to work with the Federal Reserve to implement the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility, and Disclosure Act of 2009, portions of which supersede interagency rules addressing unfair and deceptive acts and practices (UDAP).

Portions of the CARD Act will become effective on Aug. 20 of this year, with the remainder of the bill becoming effective on Feb. 22, 2010. UDAP rules that address credit cards currently have an effective date of July 1, 2010.

The CARD Act limits many of the same credit card practices that the NCUA, the Fed, and the Office of Thrift Supervision targeted via UDAP, including card issuers' ability to increase interest rates and the fees that lenders charge for use of subprime credit cards.

The NCUA said it also believes that the Fed will soon "begin issuing implementing regulations" for Regulation Z. The agency said it is "considering whether there is a need" for separate NCUA rules once Regulation Z becomes effective.

While credit unions should not be overly concerned about dealing with dueling regulatory structures, they should recognize that the UDAP rules, the CARD Act, and Regulation Z all contain similar requirements and restrictions regarding credit card practices.

According to the Credit Union National Association (CUNA), the problematic issue for credit unions in the new credit card law is the new requirement to send periodic statements at least 21 days before payment is due. This 21-day requirement has been particularly problematic because, as the law is written, it would apply to all open-ended credit, not just credit cards.

CUNA is working on this issue, discussing these operational problems with the Fed and raising credit union concerns with key staff on Capitol Hill. CUNA also plans to meet early next week with credit union lending experts to gather additional feedback on the operational compliance problems with applying the 21-day requirement to all open-end loans, and these additional concerns will be conveyed to the Fed.

For CUNA's analysis of the new credit card law, click here.

 

NEWS ARCHIVES

 


South Carolina Credit Union League & Affiliates
© All Rights Reserved
800-235-4290
webmaster@sccul.org